Re:Google told its scientists to ‘strike a positive tone’ in...
by eternalban on Wednesday December 23, 2020 @12:33PM
(#25519923)
Your [1] should add that “additionally, there is a huge funding funnel that select companies can tap to without having to produce any results at all!” So funneling money to friends and special (dark) projects is also on the table, as a simple matter of what is “possible”.
In science, we as a society throw money at something like high energy physics, because we are telling ourselves, "We love knowledge so much, that we will throw it at high energy physics, which has little economic benefit to us" [1].
In other words, you can't prove that you love knowledge for its own sake, if you only invest in fields which have economic benefits. You have to invest in fields with no benefit, to prove to ourselves that we still care. That has deep and lasting philosophical impact on society.
[1] If you read grand funding agencies internal documents, you will learn that the primary economic benefit of fields like high energy physics is training people on hard problems, who will then go and apply those skills and raise the bar in other fields.