News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by dang on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @07:59PM (#25513278)
Nationalistic flamebait is not allowed here, regardless of country. You've posted like this before, too (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25016561) — that's not ok on this site, so please don't do it again. We're trying to avoid the tedious, nasty flamewars this kind of thing leads to.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by dpeck on Monday December 21, 2020 @11:17AM (#25496233)
That is inappropriate word choice here or anywhere. Remove your slur.
Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by t0mbstone on Monday December 21, 2020 @11:30AM (#25496404)
re·tard verb past tense: retarded; past participle: retarded /riˈtärd/ delay or hold back in terms of progress, development, or accomplishment. "our progress was retarded by unforeseen difficulties"

It seems to me that the word's usage is an accurate description of America's lack of progress in this area...

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by colejohnson66 on Monday December 21, 2020 @12:07PM (#25496856)
The word itself isn’t wrong per se, but it has a negative connotation that’s associated with “slow” people (from the medical terminology “mental retardation”). It’s a playground insult to call someone “retarded” because they’re “stupid”. It could just be an American thing, but using it like that is very common.

I think a good comparison is “fag”. Sure, it means a cigarette, but it is (was?) a common insult towards gay people.

Should we not use the word? I don’t know. I’m just explaining why dpeck wrote their comment.

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by luhn on Monday December 21, 2020 @12:07PM (#25496853)
At least here in the US, it's generally no longer considered appropriate.

https://www.specialolympics.org/stories/impact/why-the-r-wor...

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by samch on Monday December 21, 2020 @09:26PM (#25502197)
Thank you. My wife worked for the Special Olympics for several years, and we were privileged to meet so many wonderful athletes in the program. I doubt a single one would think this usage of the r-word was appropriate.
Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by tesseract on Monday December 21, 2020 @12:56PM (#25497405)
It's perfectly fine in a technical context: "bacterial growth is retarded by refrigeration" or something of that nature.

But that's not how the commenter used the word. There are other, far less ambiguous and far more polite words to refer to a general lack of progress... old-fashioned, primitive, backwards, antediluvian, obstinate, ...

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by hellonoko on Monday December 21, 2020 @12:06PM (#25496851)
Take a read about "The Euphemism Treadmill"
Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by adkadskhj on Monday December 21, 2020 @12:53PM (#25497368)
It's not wrong. Imo the issue isn't the treadmill - that's natural, and will always happen with or without PC police. Unacceptable words existed long before PC police (in the modern sense) existed. Communities have long self moderated acceptable words.

The real debate is about how fast the treadmill moves.

Re:Congress is set to ban most surprise medical bills by campl3r on Monday December 21, 2020 @11:54AM (#25496703)
How so?