Very nice work. I especially liked the ability to build up a collection of papers, that the response time was good, and that the SQL could be edited directly.

Do you have any plans to add a graphical visualization of top/central papers?

That is the most requested feature and something I'm working on. It's a fun (and hard) design/data problem. Which of the 5k-150k papers do you show in the graph? And then how do you render them in a way that is both visually appealing but also conveys the most import information?

Displaying graph data in a user-friendly way is indeed a challenge. The nicest user interface I've seen is on metacademy "explore" views:

https://metacademy.org/graphs/concepts/bayesian_logistic_reg...

and src code for the graph view is here: https://github.com/metacademy/metacademy-application/blob/ma...

they do some clever hiding of edges so graph is not overwhelming, but still only O(100) nodes.... for O(100k) nodes you'll need to do some selection for sure ;)

Just curious, what source are you using for the citation graph? I seem to remember looking for an API to something like ACM digital library at one point and not really finding what I wanted, but maybe I just didn’t know how to look.

I love this idea btw, I’m going to use it to find some holiday reading!

Which crate are you using for graph manipulation?

I go through a lot of the details in my post on the Rust subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/kfiaqn/just_wanted_to...

But long story short, I end up doing most of the graph analysis by passing in the citations, using PyO3, to graph-tool in python then returning the data I need about each paper. I am planning on moving that over to Rust. But not being an academic I wanted to get feedback on the quality of the results before making it difficult to quickly test different types of algorithms.

Are you planning on open sourcing parts of it?

Eventually I'd like to move the site to open source, but right now the repo isn't in a place where I can do that. As for specific parts, it's pretty purpose built and this is my first Rust project and so I'm not sure which parts would be helpful to the community. And I doubt they would meet the communities standards just yet :)

It’s better to open source sooner rather than later even if it’s not in a place you’d want it to be. Like some of the work you have to do might be done by the community.