News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on React's UseRef Deep Dive. Parent comment

Re:React's UseRef Deep Dive by timhwang21 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:45PM (#25462018)
> it might be better to just be a standalone library

See: https://github.com/reduxjs/redux, among others.

The React ecosystem did exactly this for the past few years, but evidently it was decided that a more native approach like hooks were better.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:React's UseRef Deep Dive by valenterry on Thursday December 17, 2020 @08:50PM (#25462898)
I know redux, but I believe that there should be an even more low level library.

Coming from the backend, I miss something like the effect system builtin in Haskell/Purescript or added as a library to languages like Scala (e.g. https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/) or Kotlin (e.g. https://arrow-kt.io/docs/effects/io/)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:React's UseRef Deep Dive by schwartzworld on Saturday December 19, 2020 @09:39AM (#25477662)
Hooks are not an alternative to redux, although you could use then as one.

Personally, any time anybody has ever suggested using redux I have always fought it. I've never seen the news for a global state management library, since react has always had tools to manage state built in.

[ Parent | on HN ]