News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No Cookie for You by swiley on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:39PM (#25459436)
I really hate the lies you see on a lot of new sites that they will send cookies "necessary for basic functionality."

You're serving articles, there's no reason for session tracking!

Re:No Cookie for You by canofbars on Friday December 18, 2020 @05:07AM (#25465626)
Without cookies they can't check if you closed the cookie nag.
Re:No Cookie for You by amgutier on Thursday December 17, 2020 @04:30PM (#25460703)
I can see a need for cookies to mitigate against things like DDoS attacks, session management for paywalled content or just to leave comments on articles, favoriting certain sections. There are several reasons why as a reader you would want the site to be stateful.
Re:No Cookie for You by ancarda on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:43PM (#25462000)
How would cookies help mitigate against DDoS attacks?
Re:No Cookie for You by morei on Thursday December 17, 2020 @07:18PM (#25462273)
Helps separate real traffic from DDoS traffic. e.g. traffic from someone that also visited the site prior to the start of the DDoS is vastly more likely to be real traffic.