News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by gte525u on Thursday December 17, 2020 @10:50AM (#25456610)
NASA and aviation in general are later adopters of lead-free. It definitely wouldn't have been reflected in older standards.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by segfaultbuserr on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:00AM (#25456743)
AFAIK, lead-free soldering is never enforced in space applications. An exemption is granted because of its extremely high reliability requirements.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by mauvehaus on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:13PM (#25458371)
On several levels. Avgas is still leaded.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by dpifke on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:21PM (#25459215)
For those who want to know more about this: https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=1...

Essentially, we still don't have a viable replacement. The FAA was tasked with coming up with one by the end of 2018, but has been extended to 2021.

Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by jcims on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:01PM (#25458970)
Whoa, that's crazy. It's going to take 50+ years to get the current engines out of operation. I wonder if new engines are able to run without.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by mauvehaus on Thursday December 17, 2020 @06:34PM (#25461930)
Not a pilot or aircraft owner, but my understanding is that part of the problem is because certifying a new aero engine is insanely onerous (as is certifying anything that goes on an airplane), a lot of basically obsolete designs requiring leaded fuel were produced long after auto engines switched to not requiring leaded gas.

Why would an engine require leaded gas, you ask? Because it helps keep the valve seats from degrading. We have other anti-knock additives, but nobody has figured out a replacement for the other properties that lead has.

And since aircraft are usually extremely long-lived, we'll be stuck with this problem until a substitute is found. Merely certifying new engines that don't require lead won't solve the problem because of the remainder of the fleet that does require leaded gas.

Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by synack on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:47PM (#25459539)
Yes, there are light aircraft that run on diesel.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by octoberfranklin on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:40PM (#25458716)
Wow, that's disgusting.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by scrumper on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:15PM (#25459144)
It's pretty limited. Avgas doesn't mean jet fuel, as used by commercial aviation, it means the stuff you pump into piston engine light aircraft. Plus, at the risk of being obvious, the exhaust is either emitted way up in the air or, if at ground level, out in the middle of nowhere at an airport.
Re:NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002) by xxs on Friday December 18, 2020 @04:15AM (#25465284)
leaded solder is still allowed in the EU for medical equipment for instance.