Re:Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it send...
by fatbird on Thursday December 17, 2020 @10:53AM
(#25456655)
That happened after she was fired. You can't cite that behaviour as a reason for firing her. Violates causality.
Re:Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it send...
by dekhn on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:27AM
(#25457038)
I went back and looked at Timnit's twitter history. She has a history of calling out her bosses and saying outrageous things, from well before this incident. People have linked, for example, a tweet where she called out Jeff Dean based on things he said in an internal meeting, and he had to do a bunch of apologizing and backtracking. I can't see how an employee can remain viable after doing that.
Re:Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it send...
by xenihn on Thursday December 17, 2020 @10:56AM
(#25456687)
Her spat with the Facebook guy was before that.
Re:Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it send...
by fatbird on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:07AM
(#25456823)
That was a public argument on her core area of research. Google literally hired her to do that work. Being professionally assertive isn't toxic.
Re:Tensions in Google's ethical AI group increase as it send...
by thu2111 on Thursday December 17, 2020 @11:43AM
(#25457227)
"I’m sick of this framing. Tired of it. Many people have tried to explain, many scholars. Listen to us. You can’t just reduce harms caused by ML to dataset bias"
That's not being professionally assertive.
What about the paper trail she left on Twitter?