Re:Facebook Takes Out Newspaper Ads to Attack Apple's Streng...
by diffeomorphism on Thursday December 17, 2020 @07:12AM
(#25454866)
Some vague numbers from facebook:
> https://twitter.com/DaveStangis/status/1339183289349918721
"cut of 60% per advertising dollar." So between 2 and 3. That is incredibly little for all the surveillance it brings with it. And I don't think fb would understate here.
If "hyper targeting" is that useless, why are even still discussing allowing it?
In particular, how does it compare to somewhat targeted offline ads like (local shop advertising in local newspaper) or (car stuff advertised in car enthusiast magazine)?
Also, the question is about having a level playing field. If your competition has access to highly effective advertising, you can't afford to not use it as well. So right now you need it. However, if hyper targeting were forbidden (because the spying and stalking is prohibited by law or because browsers make it infeasible) then you don't need it.