Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by phobosanomaly on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @11:07PM
(#25452340)
That's why so many people like them.
It's a pleasant distraction from sitting in a fluorescently-lit cubicle getting diabetes, and facing the dread of going home to another night's existential crisis.
Twist that throttle and there's a gentle tap on the shoulder and a whisper, 'hey buddy, just wanted to remind you that you're actually alive'.
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by nethunters on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @09:19PM
(#25451590)
What other precautionary methods could help reduce mortality rates of motorcycles?
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by grumple on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @09:28PM
(#25451649)
Build a car around them?
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by nmridul on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:04AM
(#25453050)
In India TATA tried that. Built $2000 car (tata nano). Target audience were the bike going families.
First , the motor bikes are cheap. So you need car matching that cost and you end up compromising a lot.
https://thewire.in/business/tata-nano-why-did-the-people-not...
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by SulfurHexaFluri on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @10:04PM
(#25451922)
Keeping your speed under 40km/h would do a lot. And removing cars from streets.
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by PopeDotNinja on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @11:08PM
(#25452341)
Yeah, the average speed of traffic in Pakistan, at least in the areas I visited, was much lower that I'd expect to see in the USA.
Re:Child-safety laws may reduce the birth rate
by SulfurHexaFluri on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @11:39PM
(#25452531)
When you look at the curve of chance of death vs speed, it very very rapidly rises. You have very little risk of serious injury at 40km/h and almost certain death at 60km/h
I can't emphasize this enough.
They are no automobile, and are not comparable.