Re:The first person in the UK to have air pollution listed a...
by callumlocke on Thursday December 17, 2020 @04:35AM
(#25454035)
Having a limited supply of empathy is one way to think about this, but another (less immediately appealing) way is as fast moving moral fashions. In your example it seems like the empathy got ‘used up’, because of the order of those two events, but I think that sort of thing often happens the other way round too, in which cases it’s harder to tell ourselves stories about why. Maybe the best explanation is it’s mostly arbitrary. That’s the problem with relying on public charity and the feel-good factor as a mechanism for helping the worst off. Moral fashions are like weather – somewhat predictable, but not definitely not reliable or consistent.
Re:The first person in the UK to have air pollution listed a...
by legulere on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:46AM
(#25453266)
You also have to take into consideration feedback effects though. COVID-19 would be much worse if people didn’t react to it. There’s also an automatic reaction to it by people which is too slow though as could be seen in Wuhan, Milano and New York.
Re:The first person in the UK to have air pollution listed a...
by hyperdimension on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @03:06PM
(#25447818)
That is such a fantastic metaphor for our limited 'supply' of care/empathy.
Sometimes it feels as though we have only so much for others' plights before we run out and only have enough to focus on our own. I'm not sure.
Re:The first person in the UK to have air pollution listed a...
by gotostatement on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @05:15PM
(#25449515)
this is exactly why permanent, tax-funded, institutional safety nets are necessary. you can't rely on sporadic charity.
The Covid frenzy reminds me something that happened in my friend's village.
Four small apartment rooms burned down affecting four people.
The village went into a frenzy of help and concern. They had multiple fundraisers to raise money for the affected. Local news would go to local businesses to film them putting together care packages. People on the street would be interviewed about the disaster where the interviewee would quickly sneak in what they're doing to help the cause. The local news cycle was deep-diving on the history of each affected person to show what a good person they were, and they were filmed receiving all sorts of gifts and comically large charity checks. Facebook feeds are constantly lit up about the disaster and how everyone can pitch in a hand.
Two months later some living quarters burn down killing one and putting twenty people out of a home. But it barely even makes the news and nobody really utters a word over it. The village has already blown its concern load.
We humans have this weird laserbeam of attention, and what it will focus on is a true lottery, and when it focuses on something it ignites it and it burns to a crisp and it gives us our fill for a while, and we ignore everything else.