Re:The Case for a Pardon of Edward Snowden by President Trump
by Throwaway1771 on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @03:51PM
(#25448444)
Your comment used vague, sweeping terminology that would give the passerby reader excuses not to give a shit.
So,
Re:The Case for a Pardon of Edward Snowden by President Trump
by lern_too_spel on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:59AM
(#25453018)
What vague, sweeping terminology did I use? I specifically talked about PRISM, described how Greenwald's description of PRISM was ludicrously wrong, and noted that Greenwald didn't mention PRISM at all in this article and has never issued a correction for his PRISM reporting. Those are highly descriptive, highly specific statements.
That isn't PRISM.