Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by justQandA on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @03:59PM
(#25435182)
Any reason why you went with the "P"100 (resistant to oils) instead of the regular "N"100?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by napier on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:21PM
(#25435424)
Seems like there’s no trade off to over-engineering health and safety in the context. N100 would be adequate but the P100 additionally provides a broader spectrum of air pollution exposure reduction which in the context of infection control helps protect the mucosal barriers from damage and preserves immune fitness, preventing T-cell depletion caused by inhalation of vehicular pollution and industrial/commercial combustion emissions, smoke, and so on.
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by mcbuilder on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @04:10PM
(#25435300)
P100 is the common designation in most uses you saw pre-pandemic, i.e. Asbestos removal, and the GP is referring to a legacy mask.
Re:Estimated 1.56B face masks will have entered oceans in 2020
by computerphage on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @02:57AM
(#25440128)
P100 is much easier to find than N100