News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by thatfrenchguy on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:05PM (#25426869)
Yeah having a house 3x the size is not great for you or the environment, given that people don’t use most of their houses ;-)
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by bcheung on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:14PM (#25426936)
It's people telling me what is good for me that is another reason I left.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by lynchdt on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:54PM (#25427150)
I didn’t leave voluntarily, miss a lot of things but I absolutely don’t miss this.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by octoberfranklin on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @02:21AM (#25427851)
Then why haven't you left HN? ;)

I wish people here would stop telling me what's good for me too.

Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by dannyincolor on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:17PM (#25426949)
I think they said “the environment”.

Whether that’s important to you is - as always - completely up to you in this country. I don’t understand the animosity between different states; we can all go wherever we fit best and that’s a great thing.

Nothing wrong with wanting a big house, but also nothing wrong or coercive with mentioning it has environmental impacts

Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by chrismcb on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:40PM (#25427074)
What they actually said was "for you or the environment" without knowing anything about the op, it is hard to say that a lawyer house was bad for him. Maybe he had a family of four living in a small two bedroom. As far as the environment, almost everything we do is bad for the environment. We should try to minimize or impact, but just because something is "bad for the environment"didn't mean we should stop.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by bcheung on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @12:13AM (#25427259)
Well, the USA was supposed to be a union of states where they could more or less govern as they see fit based on their own ideology but come together when they need to. But unfortunately the Federal government has gotten involved in far too many things that should have been left up to the states and so there isn't as much diversity or tolerance for other ways of life anymore.
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by pii on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @04:40AM (#25440649)
Can you paint a clearer picture of the mechanism for federal intervention being the driver of intolerance?
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by bcheung on Monday December 21, 2020 @01:23PM (#25497724)
When something happens at the federal level it affects everyone. Someone in Texas who is conservative is going to be upset about a law that is forced on them that they don't like. However, if that law is only happening on CA and has no effect on them, then they don't care and they can be tolerant of it.

When something affects you personally because it is forced on you it is much harder to be tolerant.

If it only affects the people who want that law then it is much easier to just say "I do me, you do you".

Different states are supposed to have different ways of life based on different value systems. That way people can move to the states that are most in alignment with their values. Laws at the Federal level take that freedom away.

Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by pii on Tuesday December 22, 2020 @07:01PM (#25512920)
I see what you mean, but I think we have different definitions of tolerate
Re:Silicon Valley exodus: Bay Area tech companies leaving fo... by echelon on Monday December 14, 2020 @11:30PM (#25427021)
> Yeah having a house 3x the size is not great for you or the environment, given that people don’t use most of their houses ;-)

Who are you to cast stones?