Per Damgaard Husted her with a clarification to this remark. First of all, I would like to thank you all for the valuable feedback that we have got from you for the last 24 hours. It means everything to us. This being said, I feel like this Patent comment is making us look dishonest. So here is the deal. I hold an AI patient that we are currently not using in the product as it is now because it is not AI-based. We mention that we hold an AI patient on the last part of the About us page, in a part where we outline general information on the founders' backgrounds. That's it; it is not a dominant part of our marketing material. Our plan is still to include AI in the application when it makes sense to do so.

I like discussions and critique, and almost all of what you have said in this forum is true, and your reflections are valuable learnings for us. Please don't take this remark as a signal that I am not open to feedback because that is what we are seeking, and I prefer the negative because that is where you learn the most.