News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Slack wanted to stay independent, but was unable to compe... by snowwrestler on Friday December 11, 2020 @07:38PM (#25393815)
Slack seems like they already had everything they needed. You can do video calls natively in Slack. You can store and transfer files. They just didn’t put the pieces together; everything was kept as a minor complement to chat.

That said, I’m not sure they could have competed with Teams in MS corporate deployments under any circumstances. If a company is already using Outlook, Exchange, AD, O365, Teams plugs in very nicely. But, seems like that still leaves a pretty big market.

Re:Slack wanted to stay independent, but was unable to compe... by dexterdog on Friday December 11, 2020 @08:24PM (#25394262)
Plus it is zero marginal cost for those places where slack has expensive per user pricing.
Re:Slack wanted to stay independent, but was unable to compe... by rightbyte on Friday December 11, 2020 @09:15PM (#25394671)
How important is Office365 interactivity really? Calendar is nice but otherwise?