Re:Sales tax creates more unnecessary pain than value added tax
by chrischen on Saturday December 12, 2020 @01:26AM
(#25396110)
Yes but in practice it means that reselling old used stuff is now taxed, which of course discourages the reuse part of the reduce, reuse, recycle paradigm.
FB marketplace has the same tax requirement, so that only leaves cash transactions on craigslist now (which people probably wouldn't pay the tax even if were required).
eBay was hit by special "marketplace facilitator" clauses in remote tax laws that have popped up since South Dakota v. Wayfair. The tax is actually imposed on the marketplace, not the seller. It doesn't matter what the seller's status is relative to the above, because it is eBay that is being required to remit he tax. If the seller is independently obligated to remit tax to a given state as well, they count the eBay-collected tax against their own obligation.