News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cameras and Lenses by jeffreyrogers on Thursday December 10, 2020 @04:42PM (#25379116)
I'm sure there are examples, but in common use it is understood to be plural and has been used that way in all writing for a long time.
Re:Cameras and Lenses by moron4hire on Thursday December 10, 2020 @08:03PM (#25381031)
That is not correct

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they#Usage

> They with a singular antecedent goes back to the Middle English of the 14th century... and has remained in common use for centuries...

Re:Cameras and Lenses by jeffreyrogers on Sunday December 13, 2020 @06:55PM (#25411743)
> in common use it is understood to be plural

What I said is correct. Prior to about 4-5 years ago you did not find people using they in the singular, hence "in common use".

Re:Cameras and Lenses by dragonwriter on Thursday December 10, 2020 @08:16PM (#25381130)
> I’m sure there are examples, but in common use it is understood to be plural and has been used that way in all writing for a long time.

It is grammatically plural, but it has been accepted for semantically singular use since long before the Victorian effort to impose Latin-inspired rules on English usage which failed to eradicate it despite intense effort. (Victorian prescriptivism did have some good effects — regularized spelling FTW — but trying to eradicate clear and useful usages like singular “they” was one of its less-well-considered, but fortunately also less-successful, efforts.)

Re:Cameras and Lenses by jeffreyrogers on Sunday December 13, 2020 @06:56PM (#25411753)
> in common use it is understood to be plural

Nothing in what you wrote contradicts what I stated. The man on the street thinks they is plural, and nearly all writing treats it that way. Historical examples excepted.