News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by timeeater on Thursday December 10, 2020 @03:51PM (#25378458)
"I have a belief system that's coherent and arrived at through my personal experience"

Other people also have coherent belief systems they arrived at through their personal experience, that contradict yours.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by Applejinx on Thursday December 10, 2020 @04:09PM (#25378719)
Never said I was automatically right, timeeater. All belief systems are coherent to the believer.

They're tested by reality. It seems to be that a lot of the people who say 'orange man bad' and think that's the heart of my position, are currently dying of COVID or giving it to others. And that is their experience, though a lot of those same people are sticking with their belief systems UNTO death, not being shaken from them by their experience.

I will keep an eye out for when things in my belief system seem to be not lining up with reality. I wish those 'other people' would do likewise, but I think I'm better at it.

[dead]
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by croon on Friday December 11, 2020 @03:49AM (#25383699)
You're again misrepresenting their statements. They aren't saying that only Trump fans get covid, but that an oversized portion of Trump fans get covid due to fictional ideas about the virus.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by timeeater on Friday December 11, 2020 @08:20AM (#25385388)
Same type of claim, that is not supported by data. If you have the data, please provide it.

In the same vein, you could assume Democrats are more at risk because they put too much faith in masks, thereby entering more risky situations. Not saying that's the case. The point is, your expectation of who gets infected is merely your partisan belief, not anything rooted in evidence.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by croon on Friday December 11, 2020 @09:23AM (#25386085)
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by newen on Friday December 11, 2020 @11:16AM (#25387382)
25 million people participated in the BLM protests this summer... This paper then goes and picks on Trump supporters.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by croon on Friday December 11, 2020 @06:38PM (#25393217)
BLM has a purpose, and was despite of covid. Trump rallies are entirely pointless, and everyone there makes a statement of not wearing masks.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by newen on Friday December 11, 2020 @10:19PM (#25395103)
If you look at it from a neutral point of view, you’re making a very politically biased statement.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by croon on Monday December 14, 2020 @03:52AM (#25414840)
No. You don't have to agree with the purpose, but my statement is factual.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by newen on Monday December 14, 2020 @08:53AM (#25417483)
Give me a break...that's obviously your opinion.

First of all, the disease doesn't care about your political opinion; it will spread in protests whether you are a crusader or an infidel. So it doesn't matter what you are protesting about; what matters is disease spread.

Now regarding BLM's purpose, which was police violence presumably. Police kill around 1000 Americans a year. Not an insignificant number but pales in comparison to the pandemic.

Trump rally, pointless, entirely your biased viewpoint. They were protesting the lockdown, which has crippled the economy, shut down a massive number of small businesses, made tons of people lose their jobs, and come January, will evict tons of people. Their protests had a point, but you're obviously misrepresenting them to fit your biases.

So no, your statements were not factual.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by croon on Monday December 14, 2020 @06:52PM (#25425083)
No, there has been protests on lockdowns... Trump rallies are not it. He's the president of the US of A, he has actual power to affect things. He just doesn't like responsibility. It's a purely vain exercise.

And I'm not defending some logic around the numbers of BLM vs covid, and it's unfortunate they coincided. I'm saying that the BLM protests had been bubbling for years and through a few incidents came to a real boil this year. I fully agree that it's irresponsible covid-wise to be out in the streets.

Feel free to disagree about scale, but what if the March on Washington of 1963 coincided with a viral outbreak. Should it not have happened? I'll respect your opinion, I'm merely stating that it served a real purpose, and it's hard to pick the right time for it.