News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on French watchdog fines Google, Amazon for breaching cookies rules. Parent comment

Re:French watchdog fines Google, Amazon for breaching cookie... by h_anna_h on Thursday December 10, 2020 @03:42PM (#25378345)
Even worse, if you have cookies disabled it will keep asking you for consent over and over even if you decline/accept.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:French watchdog fines Google, Amazon for breaching cookie... by mxmel on Thursday December 10, 2020 @06:15PM (#25380107)
How are you supposed to track that someone has consented if you disable tracking? I’m assuming that declining means you can’t use any form of storage.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:French watchdog fines Google, Amazon for breaching cookie... by Macha on Friday December 11, 2020 @09:38AM (#25386258)
"trackingEnabled: 0" does not require consent and lets you acknowledge

"consentId: abc134" then looking that up in or even "consentDenied: exact timestamp" could be used to identify a user so would require consent. I suspect lots of companies want to use the second so they can choose to bug you for [more] consent at a later date, or choose to interpret the first as not allowed in case bugging the user again enough times does get consent.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:French watchdog fines Google, Amazon for breaching cookie... by Nextgrid on Thursday December 10, 2020 @06:41PM (#25380331)
Cookies for functional purposes are allowed without consent.
[ Parent | on HN ]