News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Games people play with cash flow by fairity on Thursday December 10, 2020 @02:21AM (#25370829)
> Outside of accounting, there's a tendency to dismiss this nuance as trivial and convergent in the long term. In reality, the future never comes. It's always the present.

So long as you're running a profitable business, cash flow management does seem to be a pretty trivial problem. The difference between positive and negative float is just a loan. And, if you can show a bank that cash is guaranteed to come in at a future date, you will have no problem bridging the gap with a loan or line of credit.

Re:Games people play with cash flow by dalbasal on Friday December 11, 2020 @06:51PM (#25393361)
This is exactly the fallacy this article is challenging. It is simply not true in business reality, whatever the chalkboard fungibilities.

The difference between a positive and negative float is a structural difference that has long reaching implications. On that chalkboard, the difference between a publicly listed company and a family owned business is trivial or esoteric.. best explained by portfolio theory or somesuch. Sometimes abstractions miss the point.

Re:Games people play with cash flow by mpmpmpmp on Friday December 11, 2020 @03:48PM (#25390780)
There is no such thing as "cash is guaranteed to come in at a future date". Counterparty risk is pretty much impossible to remove, only to trade away to another party.
Re:Games people play with cash flow by dalbasal on Friday December 11, 2020 @06:53PM (#25393374)
Or said another way, the model is not reality. It is a way of reasoning about reality, approximate reality, etc. Reality is not arbitrage-able without artifacts.