News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by euske on Thursday December 10, 2020 @12:28AM (#25370121)
> I don't believe the government, either side, should be the arbiters of what is real news or real information.

Shouldn't they?

When a murder happens, a court (which I guess is a part of a government) decides which testimony is true.

When a company makes food, FDA (or some similar department) gets to decide if their nutrition facts are correct or not.

ditto for IRS, FTC, etc.

What a government doesn't decide is if a certain opinion is right or wrong. But they usually urge public entities (e.g. media) to state the truth and suppress misinformation.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by nine_k on Thursday December 10, 2020 @01:07AM (#25370355)
These are all issues of safety of one's very life and health. This is why there's a proper process in courts (even if stained by plea bargaining). FDA does not offer such a process, but its powers are way more limited.

None of these are in business of deciding truthiness of arbitrary statements or opinions, and they all operate in their well-defined narrow niches and run strict fact-checking procedures, collect proofs, etc.