Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by natmaka on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @09:52PM
(#25369057)
Did you ask for further explanations? What are his sources? "His opinions" may refer to the fact that he doesn't trust the secondary source you quoted in "the phase 3 trial for the Pfizer vaccine included 43,000 people", or the primary source, or the very process/protocol of this trial...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by cmrdporcupine on Thursday December 10, 2020 @08:14AM
(#25373316)
He sent me some "sources" in a private google drive link that was access restricted and required me to enter email address to request access -- which I wasn't going to do, as said personal also makes his living doing multilevel marketing and as a "life coach"; not a contact list I have any desire to be on.
And, yeah, seems legit, right?
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by natmaka on Thursday December 10, 2020 @08:37AM
(#25373527)
> He sent me some "sources"
((...))
> required me to enter email address to request access
Such a "source" often lets you better understand what/how such material works on some people. I played this a few times and was never disappointed. A disposable email address may work.