News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by trueluk on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:11PM (#25362960)
The Supreme Court will absolutely hear that suit. Those four states bypassed thier legislatures in order to change their election laws.

To anyone willing to invest a few hours of his time, he'll find it's quite obvious this election was rife with fraud.

What's sad is that our officials refuse to audit the votes. What's sad is the GOP officials in Wayne County who tried to say there was a problem were doxed and threatened. After that, no one was willing to stand up for the truth. Is there anything more important than making sure every legal vote was counted and illegal votes are discarded? They don't want transparency. That's the issue.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by tsimionescu on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:47PM (#25364648)
> To anyone willing to invest a few hours of his time, he'll find it's quite obvious this election was rife with fraud.

And yet none of the president's lawyers have actually brought forth even 1 claim of fraud before a judge, despite their rhetoric. Every time when actually in court, they have shied away from claiming accusations of fraud.

So no, not only is it not obvious that the election was rife with fraud, it is in fact extremely obvious that no real amount of fraud has taken place at all (only using "real amount" instead of "any at all" because I'm certain that you'll find 1 or maybe 2 people somewhere who have stolen maybe a dozen votes).

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by czep on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:39PM (#25364535)
> Those four states bypassed thier legislatures in order to change their election laws.

When these special measures were enacted in March to accommodate voting during a pandemic, ample time was given for public comment and legal challenge. Why weren't these suits raised at that time? It seems awfully suspicious that plantiffs had no issue with the mail balloting until they lost the election.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by whiddershins on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:47PM (#25364652)
People did sue at the time
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by Daishiman on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:32PM (#25364415)
Dude...

There were multiple audits in a ton of states. Every time, it came out that the results were fair.

You're going to need to come up with much more than that.

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by uoaei on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:44PM (#25363548)
What has anyone done that is explicitly illegal?

Cite the statutes and laws.

The fact is, those procedures (i.e., "bypassing legislatures") have been implemented precisely for situations like this. Don't get mad just because people actually use them.