It would be classified as a factual statement for the survey study even though it's an inaccurate statement (intersexed people exist)

As

>Respondents were asked to determine if each was a factual statement (whether accurate or not) or an opinion statement (whether agreed with or not).

I never gave my opinion on the matter, but since you asked, no, I don't personally care if corporations ban me because I disagree with their TOS (which had inaccurate statements of fact in it), that's their right. I probably wouldn't be doing business with them in the first place, though it's also my right to petition them to change it if I wanted to. Example: When I was a kid Walmart only sold censored CDs so everyone knew not to buy CDs from Walmart.

Sex and gender aren't the same thing.

then go somewhere else for content

says the same people who cry if someone makes a mean tweet or a comedian tells an offcolor joke and calls for them to be deplatformed.

how about i argue for them not to censor, and you go to another platform if you want your safe space.