Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by Gunax on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @04:29PM
(#25365370)
So I think you're right in the literal sense, but rainer is accurate in the sentiment.
The media used the word 'interference' in an exaggerated and nefarious context, and they didn't seem very interested in clearing it up. Election interference--without context--is usually taken to mean vote interference.
Like many things, it isn't an outright lie. But I do think it was misleading. And while you might not have been mislead, enough people were--as evidenced by that poll.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by cwkoss on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:47PM
(#25362412)
Russian "collusion" was the primary topic on twitter for most neoliberal pundits and party consultants in 2017
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by joshuamorton on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:20PM
(#25363119)
As someone who followed things fairly closely at the time, that's not true. There was talk of meddling with voter rolls, but changing of votes was basically not discussed and was quickly dismissed.
Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio...
by jjeaff on Tuesday December 15, 2020 @08:40PM
(#25437999)
Well, that was found to be absolutely true. Just look at the emails released by Don Jr. himself.
They planned to meet with someone who they believed to be working for the Kremlin in order to get dirt on their opponent.
I also never really heard many assertions that any of this was significant enough to have likely swayed the election.