YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread election fraud

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by macspoofing on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:20PM (#25361791)

Are you trying to make the point that YouTube is a special interest site and not a platform? Or are you trying to make the point that YouTube should have its cake and eat it too by being protected as a platform, and at the same time play the role of a curator and publisher?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by nobody9999 on Thursday December 10, 2020 @03:49AM (#25371372)

https://popehat.substack.com/p/section-230-is-the-subject-of...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by nobody9999 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:42PM (#25362296)

>are you trying to make the point that YouTube should have its cake and eat it too by being protected as a platform, and at the same time play the role of a curator and publisher?

I could waste everyone's time and explain why that's flat wrong. Instead, I'll refer you here[0] which will explain, in detail, why you're wrong about Section 230.

[0] https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200531/23325444617/hello...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube to remove content that alleges widespread electio... by gitweb on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @06:51PM (#25367301)

I'm likely banned from HN now from all the downvotes I received for the perfectly legit response, yet some people appear to not like facts so much that they just downvote to censor (which HN does).

[ Parent | on HN ]