News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by gamblor956 on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @12:31PM (#25361125)
There is a large contingent of pro-Tesla readers on HN that cannot abide by any criticism of Tesla.

Articles critical of Tesla always get flagged, and most of the time dang unflags them, especially if they're from newspapers like LAT.

Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by laviamo on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:03PM (#25361514)
But what's their point? Are those odd TSLA shareholders?
Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by marvin on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:50PM (#25363637)
Most who claim that HN has a rabid and irrational pro-Tesla cult must have missed the last seven years of incredibly critical commentary. I started noticing in 2015. Maybe I'll put together a montage one day. The claims of a pro-Tesla cult are certainly more widespread than uncritical fanboyism.
Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by pbreit on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @01:01PM (#25361490)
Can they build in a mechanism to mitigate baseless flagging?
Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by shuntress on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @02:32PM (#25363307)
"most of the time dang unflags them" is that mechanism.

If I found a reliable way to automate the recognition of bad-faith user interactions I would sell it to google and retire before bringing it to HN.

edit: Also, apparently, users can "vouch" for posts which presumably is just the inverse of flagging a post.

Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by jtbayly on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @03:05PM (#25363922)
You can vouch for a comment, but not a post. (Except by emailing dang.)
Re:Former Tesla engineer sues for defamation by pbreit on Wednesday December 09, 2020 @07:13PM (#25367548)
Well, for example, deducting karma (or whatever) from people who flag stuff that dang unflags.