News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by Poiesis on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @07:21AM (#2535963)
I am always impressed by this when I read it--not because of the cars but the motivation. Here's a company that is so desperate to increase its ad revenue that it's willing to build robot cars so that it has that many more eyeballs to serve up advertisements to.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by sien on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @07:45AM (#2536014)
Here's a company that is smart enough to know that they could have a major part of a market though could explode. Google don't just have to sell ads. They have loads of very smart people. They could wind up being the major provide for driverless cars.

Sebastian Thrun works for Google now. He's one of the world's foremost experts in the field.

Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by larrik on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @08:59AM (#2536231)
"They could wind up being the major provide for driverless cars."

I'd say they could be the major provider for driverless car technology. I don't think they should get into actual car manufacturing.

Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by MatthewPhillips on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @09:47AM (#2536395)
Bingo, this is going to be a big field in the future. AI is outside the core competency of car manufacturers; they'll have to buy that tech from some one. Google's ad revenue could look puny by comparison some day.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by axylone on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @11:23AM (#2536779)
This sounds like the history of a company out of a Stephenson or Gibson book. I want to believe...
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by sien on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @07:35PM (#2538872)
Indeed. This is what I meant.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by theBobMcCormick on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @12:37PM (#2537102)
This could also be part of Google looking for revenue sources beyond advertising. As other commenter have pointed out, if Google can make this work and smooth out the very non-trivial legislative and liability issues, there's an absolute fortune to be made licensing this technology to car companies. Think about it. If the technology works, and it's legal in your state, do you know anyone who wouldn't want a self-driving car?! It would revolutionize commuting. You could nap, read, watch TV on your phone or tablet, etc. instead of staring in boredom at the bumper ahead of you.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by sahaj on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @10:21PM (#2539265)
Google looking for revenue sources beyond advertising.

Naw. They are hoping that instead of spending your time behind the wheel, you will be spending it on the internet watching some Google ads.

/s

Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by VMG on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @09:37AM (#2536358)
They probably build robot cars because they are an artificial intelligence company.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by maigret on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @10:28AM (#2536551)
Yes. They probably can make quite some money by patenting that tech and licensing the components to car makers.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by rakkhi on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @09:59AM (#2536441)
Why be so cynical? Here is a company that has found such a massive golden egg that at least for now it can hire really really smart people to work on cool projects that may end up changing the world.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by StavrosK on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @09:24AM (#2536303)
I think they just like playing with stuff that is this cool. It's great that it aligns with their business model, but I don't think the thought process went "hey, let's build a driverless car so people can see look at ads more!"
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by dodo53 on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @10:07AM (#2536474)
It's also a good recruitment tool having a couple of world-class people working on stuff that interests a lot of computer science types.
Re:Google lobbies Nevada to allow driverless cars by rorrr on Wednesday May 11, 2011 @12:38PM (#2537103)
No, they are building robot cars because

1) They can sell them (the market is enormous)

2) It's fun and interesting

3) Great for the overall company image (as innovators)