News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PR firm pushing anti-Google message for undisclosed client. Parent comment

Re:PR firm pushing anti-Google message for undisclosed client by lsc on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @09:01PM (#2534684)
>I'd say selectively presenting one side is dishonest.

do you vote with your dollars in this regard?

If there was a bigger PR penalty for not revealing unpleasant truths and maybe more support for a company that does reveal unpleasant truths about itself, more companies would be more open.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PR firm pushing anti-Google message for undisclosed client by truthtechnician on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @09:37PM (#2534778)
Whether he votes with his dollars or not is irrelevant to the fact that selectively presenting the truth to influence people is dishonest.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PR firm pushing anti-Google message for undisclosed client by lsc on Tuesday May 10, 2011 @09:48PM (#2534804)
right, but it has everything do do with the profitability of honesty.
[ Parent | on HN ]