News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qt 6.0 by detaro on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @09:41AM (#25345722)
The problem is that you have no idea what they'll think is a reasonable license fee in 3 years (and that's not theoretical, Qt does change their mind on terms and fees regularly when there's another random sales target to meet). With the previous model, you only have that issue when you want to update, and know you can always ship what you currently have to your customers in the future at known cost.
Re:Qt 6.0 by Forge36 on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @10:10AM (#25346140)
I wonder if "cost lock-in" for 6.0 would make sense in this case? 7.0 is a new version with a new price? (or 6.1?)

This allows price increases with major changes.

"Free support for life" isn't sustainable, and striking the balance here is hard.

Re:Qt 6.0 by macjohnmcc on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @10:43AM (#25346686)
Change for support. If I am happy with the version I have and don't need support I gain nothing in a subscription model based licensing.
Re:Qt 6.0 by Nullabillity on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @10:53AM (#25346862)
If they had anything valuable with actual recurring costs then they wouldn't be this desperate to force you into their subscription model.
Re:Qt 6.0 by tomc1985 on Tuesday December 08, 2020 @02:54PM (#25350471)
> "Free support for life" isn't sustainable, and striking the balance here is hard.

Image-Line (makers of FLStudio) have been pulling it off for a couple of decades now...

"Celebrating Lifetime Free Updates for over 20 years" -- right on their front page