News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX gets $886M from FCC to subsidize Starlink in 35 st... by mssundaram on Monday December 07, 2020 @06:35PM (#25339282)
> Mars .... Compared with the absurd amounts of money wasted on defense contractors

Couldn't we spend absurd amounts of money on fixing Earth instead? Surely it's easier than starting from even less resources and livable environment than Mars.

There is a cultural myth in New Age communities that humans decimated Mars and came to Earth after, or something like that. We should fix Earth first

Re:SpaceX gets $886M from FCC to subsidize Starlink in 35 st... by maccam94 on Monday December 07, 2020 @08:03PM (#25340171)
There's not much we can do if Earth is hit with another giant asteroid. Or some massive biological or radiological disaster. Or some other type of impossible to predict or mitigate disasters that could render Earth uninhabitable for humans. Musk's goal is to make the human race multi-planetary, not escape to Mars. Just as you should back up your critical data more than one hard drive, or run redundant servers to ensure your service runs reliably, populating multiple planets would ensure the continuity of the human race should some disaster befall us on Earth.
Re:SpaceX gets $886M from FCC to subsidize Starlink in 35 st... by Strom on Monday December 07, 2020 @06:45PM (#25339378)
> Couldn't we spend absurd amounts of money on fixing Earth instead?

We're already spending more than 99.99% of our money on Earth. Are you advocating for a strict 100%?

Re:SpaceX gets $886M from FCC to subsidize Starlink in 35 st... by sumedh on Monday December 07, 2020 @07:16PM (#25339673)
> Couldn't we spend absurd amounts of money on fixing Earth instead?

The US can use some of the trillions it wasted(and still wasting) on middle east wars for fixing Earth.