If you are expected to add 2-3 features daily, first, look for a new job.

If they stick to it though, you're basically forced to reduce the feature's scope to the bare minimum. So instead of a "implement this form", you'd have tasks in the form of "implement this form field".

I don't know what situation you're in, but to me it sounds like they're steering towards giving little commitment and cheating the system to meet some arbitrary counter-productive productivity goal.

At a more agile org, getting 2-3 stories done in one day isn't too extraordinary. A PR that follows some of the rules from the OP (especially 5/6/7) might only take 5-10 minutes to review completely.

If you can't slow down enough to do that, or your stories are so large they require more attention, that might be a red flag situation? Writing code faster than you can review it will eventually catch up to the team/org.

Maybe at a tiny startup org that doesn't have many users or sensitive data or money.

Also only works when a team has a network of trust.

Every company I have worked for in my 20 plus years has been a lead/architect/cto/boss and everyone reporting to that single person. Reviews when done take many weeks.