There has been research - these people don't exist.
https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-hea...
The fact that the "new name" (IEI) seems to ignore/discredit the primary claims of the sufferers at the outset, and that a multi-billion (trillion?) dollar industry would somewhat prefer these people don't exist, I remain skeptical of recent studies. (A view no doubt also biased by personal experience.)
That older studies show the effect, and newer ones don't isn't a smoking gun, but it is a cause for skepticism.
At least, one thing almost all studies agree on is "more research is required".
You have the need for scepticism round the wrong way. Scepticism is needed when dealing with claims that some humans can detect radio frequencies, despite no single human that has been tested being able to demonstrate such a skill, and no proposed mechanism for how this should be possible.
But set that aside that for a moment. Consider that it's well-established that EMF can and does affect human tissue, and it's also well-established that some humans are extraordinarily sensitive and susceptible to harm from tiny doses of just about anything you can name (versus "normal" people who aren't).
Therefore, I have no idea why ordinarily intelligent people will readily believe EMF/RF hypersensitivity to be completely impossible.
For often-overlooked background in EMF research and health effects, here is a comprehensive list of 2300 (pre-70's) studies: https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Naval...
You might also consider US NTP's study on cellphone radiation.
> There has been research - these people don't exist.
OTOH, RF reception through dental fillings or bridgework is a bit more plausible.
Guess what? She stopped complaining about feeling it or feeling sick from it. I don’t know if she eventually found out it was on the whole time (from my sister), but she now uses WiFi herself and has even asked me to help fix it when it was down.
Perhaps some people are just sensitive to SSID broadcasting? ;)
Yes. It's possible but isn't the general understanding that it's extremely unlikely?
Many, many things are possible but some criteria has to be applied to decide which ones we can spend time on investigating. Werewolf research is currently massively underfunded for good reason.
(I love the werewolf research line, definitely stealing that for when I'm on the other side of this argument.)
Done any research into people who are medically hyper-sensitive, sometimes at the milliwatt level, to RF energy?
Is it possible that the cumulative effects of compounded milliwatts could potentially have harmful effects, that have yet to be sufficiently studied or understood?
Maybe.
I'm not at all suggesting there is a massive conspiracy to do whatever to everyone by deploying 5G or Wifi or whatever else. But I am saying that "move fast and break things" is an irresponsible modus operandi when the things might be us.
The race for faster and make more money does NOT have a good history of safety for us, nor the planet. Proceed with caution, and value those who doubt. What have you got to lose? Your Netflix buffering 2 seconds faster?
And you think I'm crazy?