Re:We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
by jeromenerf on Saturday December 05, 2020 @07:25AM
(#25314034)
It was my impression that Twitter was mostly about spreading false negativity. Anyway, I would prefer we discuss the content of the paper and what it implies for large models.
Re:We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
by dash2 on Saturday December 05, 2020 @07:19AM
(#25314001)
The issue isn’t false positivity. It’s clear argument, politeness, precision and a willingness to assume the best of your interlocutor.
Re:We read the paper that forced Timnit Gebru out of Google
by saagarjha on Saturday December 05, 2020 @04:02PM
(#25318316)
I’m not asking you to spread false positivity, I’m asking you to not read quotes of a rereading of a paper by an author who is not the person we’re discussing and then using it to complain that a researcher is useless and that her entire field is useless.
A comment that started off with “it seems like Timnit Gebru mat have overestimated the impact…” is not false positivity.
Twitter already exists, we don’t need another place online to spend all day spreading false positivity.