News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Project Loom and Structured Concurrency. Parent comment

Re:Project Loom and Structured Concurrency by vips7L on Friday December 04, 2020 @07:06PM (#25310075)
> ergonomic (Rust, Go, Kotlin, Swift, TypeScript, etc), that it's kind of painful to go back to Java.

I really don't know how you can include Go here. It's extremely unergonomic to manually write for loops, and to deal with pointers and references.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Project Loom and Structured Concurrency by ragnese on Monday December 07, 2020 @01:58PM (#25335712)
That's true. And honestly, I don't personally like Go. I included it out of respect. :)

But the whole static duck typing thing is really nice and much less awkward than Java-style interfaces, IMO.

[ Parent | on HN ]