Re:Google staff rally behind fired AI researcher
by jeffbee on Friday December 04, 2020 @03:11PM
(#25307124)
Not sure why you are being downvoted. I see how reasoned your response is to what I said. It is a clear contrast to how the AI ethics researcher engaged in the Twitter thread. Two totally different hypothetical conversations:
A: Training data is a cause of this bias
B: But not the only cause
A: True
vs. A: Training data is a cause of this bias
B: I am so sick of this. You are not permitted to speak.
A: I am deleting my Twitter account.
Re:Google staff rally behind fired AI researcher
by joshuamorton on Friday December 04, 2020 @03:18PM
(#25307232)
Any support for Dr. Gebru seems to be against the HN ethos at the moment, I have some theories as to why ;)
> You are not permitted to speak.
I really don't think this is a fair reading of her tweet. I don't see any way to read her actual tweet claiming Yann can't speak at all on the subject. I do see a plea to engage more with domain experts (which to reiterate: my understanding is that Yann has a history of ignoring on the subject)
Re:Google staff rally behind fired AI researcher
by kenjackson on Friday December 04, 2020 @03:25PM
(#25307343)
Reading these threads is really disappointing. I can in may ways already empathize with Timnit -- its exhausting seeing people who are typically bright just completely miss the point.
But if you change to a different topic like privacy then these same people really get all of this nuance that they completely seem to miss here...
To use an example that comes up: do we solve the ethical qualms of a system that predicts incarceration rate based on facial structure by getting a better dataset? Is it even ethical to attain such a "better" dataset, what does "better" even mean in the context?