FCC to require email addresses on applications for amateur radio licenses

Re:FCC to require email addresses on applications for amateu... by tzs on Friday December 04, 2020 @02:11PM (#25306377)

It's not clear to me from your site what advantages your service has over already existing well-known services. Most people already have an email solution, so I think you need to make it clear how yours is different and why that might be better for them.

For example, I've already got Fastmail's standard plan ($5/month if purchased on a month-to-month basis). That allows 600 aliases, 8000 receives per day, 8000 sends per day, 30 GB email storage, 10 GB file storage. Your $5/month plan has bigger limits for some of those, and smaller limits for some of those, but I'm not seeing anything that tells me I might find your service useful either in addition to or as a replacement for Fastmail.

For email, I think a lot of people are going to lean toward an established provider in the hopes that this increases the chances of them being around long term.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:FCC to require email addresses on applications for amateu... by loh on Friday December 04, 2020 @05:55PM (#25309430)

Thanks for the very helpful feedback.

Last time I used Fastmail, I had to manually setup the aliases in advance, before they could receive mail. It also isn't possible to send from aliases on Fastmail. I find Fastmail's UI/UX to be too cumbersome for what I want to do with my email.

Once I've added a few more key features and polished the UI a bit, I am planning on revamping the landing page to make things clearer.

Thanks again for the feedback. It's incredibly useful.

[ Parent | on HN ]