Re:Google fired employees for union activity, says US agency
by shadowgovt on Friday December 04, 2020 @10:18AM
(#25303155)
> Should the company ban, say, oil and gas companies from GCP because a few people get angry on industryinfo
I mean, maybe. They'd ban them if the few people were the owners and the SVPs.
If they company did, they'd be within their rights to. The only problem would be all the money they'd leave on the table. Usually (1), that's been the backstop against corporations operating with their private ethics on their sleeve; corps that make a habit of leaving money on the table tend to get left behind by the market.
If Google started banning GCP use for ethical reasons, some other company would step up to fill the gap; no doubt.
(1) Usually. Chik-fil-A supports conversion therapy for LGBTQ people and Hobby Lobby's owners have used their assets for "art acquisition" that was illegal.
I mean, maybe. They'd ban them if the few people were the owners and the SVPs.
If they company did, they'd be within their rights to. The only problem would be all the money they'd leave on the table. Usually (1), that's been the backstop against corporations operating with their private ethics on their sleeve; corps that make a habit of leaving money on the table tend to get left behind by the market.
If Google started banning GCP use for ethical reasons, some other company would step up to fill the gap; no doubt.
(1) Usually. Chik-fil-A supports conversion therapy for LGBTQ people and Hobby Lobby's owners have used their assets for "art acquisition" that was illegal.