Re:US ends era of emotional support animals on planes
by 1123581321 on Thursday December 03, 2020 @08:02PM
(#25297706)
The naive $0 in this example is exactly the issue. Pet owners don’t notice the damage and wear (over a dog’s entire lifetime, substantial), so they contest it when they are wrong. If an expense is effectively guaranteed to be occurred, it should be paid.
Additionally, a landlord will want to work on the space more often than once every 14 years. A security deposit does not cover this.
Additionally a tenant renting for 14 years is making a suboptimal financial decision regardless of pet ownership. Much more than $15k would be unnecessarily spent, for many people. A tenant who wants to get the better end financially, especially a pet owner, will buy or at least keep the landlord honest about market costs of the rental.
Additionally, a landlord will want to work on the space more often than once every 14 years. A security deposit does not cover this.
Additionally a tenant renting for 14 years is making a suboptimal financial decision regardless of pet ownership. Much more than $15k would be unnecessarily spent, for many people. A tenant who wants to get the better end financially, especially a pet owner, will buy or at least keep the landlord honest about market costs of the rental.