Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by JackC on Thursday December 03, 2020 @11:29AM
(#25290595)
I'm really excited by what Playwright has been up to on the python side recently with the pytest-playwright package. Browser-testing a Django app can be as simple as:
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by samdamsamma on Saturday December 05, 2020 @02:44AM
(#25312680)
It would be neat if I could get coverage from these tests using python, but other than that I agree. Playwright is great.
Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by WalterGR on Thursday December 03, 2020 @09:49PM
(#25298354)
It’s been some time since I’ve used Selenium, but I don’t remember it being any more complicated than that to test arbitrary websites.
What is that code doing that’s special?
Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by sharmi on Thursday December 03, 2020 @10:29PM
(#25298557)
Not OP. For one thing, Selenium was not super reliable, at least for me, especially when trying to run multiple instances. Do note that I used the official docker swarm method.
When I was exploring that option, Playwright was still windows only. Super excited to see it is available on Linux and Mac.
Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by arjun27 on Thursday December 03, 2020 @10:42PM
(#25298623)
Playwright has always supported all platforms: Win, Linux and Mac. Is there something that didn’t work for you?
Re:Benchmark: Puppeteer vs. Selenium vs. Playwright vs. WebD...
by sharmi on Thursday December 03, 2020 @10:58PM
(#25298718)
Maybe it didn't have python support? Sorry, I may have misremembered. I do remember something missing that I couldn't use it in my existing dev setup. As solo developer, I prefer to keep my dependencies minimal, mostly python.