Apple creates fewer negative externalities than any of their competitors. This is well documented.
I don’t see how this analogy works.
Yes!
The people building the future that don't happen to work at Apple have to work that much harder. They are less productive because of the toll Apple extracts.
App Store rules, policy conformance, release restrictions, and Apple tax impose a huge overhead on everyone. There are higher order, dynamical impacts that tough even non-Apple users. (Kind of like secondhand smoke!)
Apple users are serving their device by surrendering freedoms to it. It should be the other way around. Apple users pay more, they get less, and the software delivered to them is 15% less good than it could be.
Competition can't get started or survive. The ocean is being over-fished, and natural evolution has been artificially controlled by one entity.
Apple users are worse off than in the parallel universe where App Store didn't happen.
“Apple users are worse off than in the parallel universe where App Store didn't happen.”
What you are saying here is that your argument is based on conjecture. There is no factual basis to it at all. This is literally a fantasy.
“App Store rules, policy conformance, release restrictions, and Apple tax impose a huge overhead on everyone.”
Only in a world where these things are not part of why Apple is successful.
These are not problems, they are solutions to the complex problem of creating a market in which consumers are willing to spend money on software.
This is not conjecture. It is a fact borne out by the huge amounts of money people do in fact spend on Apps.
We wouldn’t be having this discussion of Apple hadn’t created a marketplace people trust.
Believe it or not, I actually want a parallel universe where Apple isn’t the only trusted platform, and I want the alternative to be open, not just another giant corporation.
However, the only way to make that happen is is if we build the technologies to enable it.
We won’t be able to do that if the government regulates software distribution.
Big tobacco.
And that's a great analogy. And just like tobacco might be something the consumer wants, it's bad for the broader system.
Apple is creating negative externalities that ripple across our industry, all the while bringing smiles to consumers that don't know about the cost.