Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by philsnow on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @06:30PM
(#25283256)
At one of my first jobs, one of the things I had to agree to was having read "the employee handbook".. but it was not a pdf or other document, it was part of an internal wiki or something, with in-links and out-links all over the place.
I don't recall if I tried to figure out whether the strongly connected component that comprised the handbook was the same as "all pages on the wiki", but I was a little distressed at the time (this being one of my first jobs) that I was being asked to sign my name on something that I couldn't realistically read.
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by buran77 on Thursday December 03, 2020 @03:20AM
(#25286771)
There's always a price to pay for all the innovation that happens in SV. It's just that it ends up being paid by the people rather than by the companies. Companies can afford to pay for the most exclusive of bodyguards, the government.
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by sxp on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:51AM
(#25285860)
When I was hired by Google in 2010, I was sent physical papers to sign and return. I distinctly remember this because Google mailedthe papers to my old address from my first application rather than my 2010 address so I had to drive to my family member's house to get papers on a Friday and send them back by Monday.
I still have email copies of the contracts which they sent in parallel. This includes General Hiring Contract & Salary and a standard NDA with California Section 2870 modification.
Re:Google illegally spied on workers before firing them, US ...
by discordance on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @07:07PM
(#25283566)
That’s quite reminiscent of the user experience Google’s customers go through with the TOS
(I couldn't say what fraction of my employment paperwork was handled in this way, but things like IP assignment were definitely included.)