News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on An Update on PromQL Compatibility Across Vendors. Parent comment

Re:An Update on PromQL Compatibility Across Vendors by valyala on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @01:48PM (#25279855)
It would be great conducting a benchmark between Promscale and VictoriaMetrics similar to this one - https://valyala.medium.com/prometheus-vs-victoriametrics-ben... . It differs from TSBS in the following aspects:

* It is based on real-world data instead of synthetic data.

* It measures resources usage (RAM, CPU, disk IO, disk space) during production-like load instead of measuring peak performance under the maximum synthetic load.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:An Update on PromQL Compatibility Across Vendors by pointestimate on Thursday December 03, 2020 @11:37AM (#25290718)
I would love to have some kind of integration between Victoria Metrics and Promscale, using VM for ingest from things like InfluxDB and Promscale for SQL queries on stable data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:An Update on PromQL Compatibility Across Vendors by valyala on Thursday December 03, 2020 @06:02PM (#25296592)
This should be already possible - just collect Influx line protocol data with vmagent [1] and write it to Promscale.

[1] https://victoriametrics.github.io/vmagent.html

[ Parent | on HN ]