Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by patwolfe on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:04AM
(#25275939)
This seems misleading. If you needed to use anywhere close to 24 hours of cpu computation per day, wouldn’t you not use a cloud provider? And most tenants will only use a fraction of that per day, so 77 days of CPU usage could take years to use.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by riknox on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:05AM
(#25275949)
I thought the point is with the new announcement/EULA terms that a day was the minimum amount of time you could rent from Amazon for. I could have misunderstood of course.
Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by signal11 on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:24AM
(#25276107)
As far as I know, there's a minimum tenancy period of 24 hours, but after that it's like "standard" EC2 where you're billed per second.
Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by patwolfe on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:06AM
(#25275961)
I believe you rent a day to buy in, but that’s a day of CPU usage measured by clock time. So it expires based on your usage, not 24 hours later.
Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by csunbird on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:18AM
(#25276055)
I thought the EC2 pricing model is, even when the instance is shut down, you continue paying, since it is still reserved.
Re:Amazon’s cloud Macs cost $25.99 a day. 77 days of usage w...
by api on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @08:25AM
(#25276112)
This is true for just about any architecture. It's usually a lot cheaper to buy your own machine and put it in a closet if you need it doing work most or all of the time.
The only time that doesn't make sense is if it's customer-facing and needs better than 99.9% uptime or needs a lot of bandwidth, as those things are better done from a data center.