News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AWS Lambda pricing now per ms. Parent comment

Re:AWS Lambda pricing now per ms by munns on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @02:06PM (#25268596)
Interesting. Not possible today. We'd still encourage paralyzation up through multiple concurrency of functions being executed.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AWS Lambda pricing now per ms by JoshTriplett on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @02:46PM (#25269029)
I would love to see this as well: having 96-vCPU Lambda instances (or instances that match the biggest C-family instance you have) would solve a lot of problems for me. The execution model of Lambda (start a runtime, handle requests, AWS handles pool management) feels much easier to use than managing a pool.

Someone from AWS once commented to me that "if you're ever having to manage a pool rather than letting us manage it, that's a gap in our services".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AWS Lambda pricing now per ms by chrisweekly on Tuesday December 01, 2020 @10:59PM (#25273106)
"paralyzation" -> parallelization, yeah? :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AWS Lambda pricing now per ms by munns on Wednesday December 02, 2020 @11:04AM (#25277631)
It was a long day yesterday, thank you :)
[ Parent | on HN ]