Your first sentence is quite tricky to parse due to the triple negative. I parsed it as:
Most people that email you will care if you ignore them.
Is that a... triple negative?
I think you mean senders expect a response?
Let’s play a game, here’s how I would rephrase your first sentence:
You are often not the kind of person who can afford ignoring emails.
Re:Email Lessons from Napoleon
by forgotmypw17 on Monday November 30, 2020 @05:55PM
(#25260108)
Do you triage your spam?
What is the false positive ratio, do you think?
Re:Email Lessons from Napoleon
by thaumasiotes on Monday November 30, 2020 @07:11PM
(#25260731)
My false positive ratio for "spam" marked automatically by gmail is around 50%. It's only that low because I started receiving occasional spam emails; it was more like 90%.
(To be clear, I've interpreted your question as "of emails that got sent to the spam folder, how many of them had no business being in there?")
I need to read every non-spam email I receive and give a response if only to keep people in my network.