News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Second Swiss firm allegedly sold encrypted spying devices by colechristensen on Sunday November 29, 2020 @02:08AM (#25243494)
> The narrative of doing something for the greater good should be treated as a lie until the burden of evidence is so high that you are forced to accept that it was indeed good.

An obvious impossible standard, more than that you can’t really know if an action was right or wrong without an oracle to tell you what would have happened if different forces had been made.

Re:Second Swiss firm allegedly sold encrypted spying devices by tsimionescu on Sunday November 29, 2020 @07:32AM (#25244786)
Yes, that was mostly the point - you should assume that nefarious actions are done for nefarious purposes. Assuming they are done for noble purposes risks normalizing them much more than the opposite. Your president has assassinated a foreign dignitary? Assume they are a criminal now. Perhaps in 50 years you will find out that it was of the outmost importance for world peace and prosperity, but it is far more likely that it was some petty revenge or power struggle.
Re:Second Swiss firm allegedly sold encrypted spying devices by csunbird on Sunday November 29, 2020 @05:47AM (#25244320)
That is why you should never be doing that kind of things. Nefarious acts almost always produce nefarious results. I agree with the parent comment completely.