News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:K6: Like unit testing, for performance by na-- on Saturday November 28, 2020 @04:07PM (#25240555)
This used to be an issue with older k6 versions, but since v0.27.0 we have arrival-rate executors [1] that should address the biggest issue of coordinated omission. And we've always measured the max value of all metrics, even when they are not exported to some external output and we just show the end-of-test summary.

It has been a while since I watched these Gil Tene talks, so I might be missing something, but I think the only remaining task we have is to adopt something like his HDR histogram library [2]. And that's mostly for performance reasons, though we'll probably play around with the correction logic as well.

[1] https://k6.io/docs/using-k6/scenarios/arrival-rate

[2] https://github.com/loadimpact/k6/issues/763

Re:K6: Like unit testing, for performance by atombender on Saturday November 28, 2020 @05:23PM (#25241054)
That's perfect, thanks!