Speaking of abstracts, did you read the abstract from the paper you're commenting about? I don't think you did, because it outlines how this approach is different, and maybe if there was something better than the abstract, you would have read it and not assume it's the same as what we're using abstracts for today.

In short, here's the major differences:

> SciTLDR contains both author-written and expert-derived TLDRs

> CATTS improves upon strong baselines under both automated metrics and human evaluations