Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by oskapt on Friday November 27, 2020 @03:55PM
(#25232489)
We applied for a returning resident visa. She went in for the appointment, with all the documentation, and that's when the consular told her that unless she'd been in a coma for the last several years, it was within her power to return. She could have divorced me and returned to the US, therefore the criteria for the RRV did not apply. She was told to submit for the IR-1.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by proberts on Friday November 27, 2020 @04:03PM
(#25232552)
That's an outrageous statement and completely at odds with the law. I would get your Congressman or Senator involved (they do these kinds of things all the time) and in the meantime, submit an I-130 so you don't waste time if you can't get this decision reversed.
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by oskapt on Friday November 27, 2020 @04:09PM
(#25232591)
Ok. Thank you for the guidance.
Re:I'm Peter Roberts, immigration attorney who does work for...
by hn_throwaway_99 on Saturday November 28, 2020 @01:48AM
(#25235812)
Wow, as a native-born US citizen, after reading your story I just feel honestly sad and ashamed. Like I seriously want to tell your wife "I'm sorry for the dipshittery you are experiencing from US government bureaucrats."
I mean, here you have a situation where someone does everything right, can't fly back to the US due to Covid, and then is denied her current statues due to being out of the US too long. "Catch-22" wasn't supposed to be a literal instruction manual on how bureaucracies should function.